Category Archives: Others

India grants free visas to Maldivian medical tourists

INDIA is now offering Maldivian nationals free 90-day visas for medical tourism in a reversal of last year’s tightening of visa regulations for this segment.

Medical visa holders will no longer be required to report to the Foreign Regional Registration Office for visas with under 180 days’ validity.

Parvez Dewan, secretary at the Ministry of Tourism said: “It is a major visa liberalisation measure for Maldivian nationals. Only two other countries, Nepal and Bhutan, are provided free visas.

“We expect the move will benefit south Indian cities like Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai and Trivandrum the most, because of the robust medical facilities available there and because the region is known for Ayurveda (wellness treatments).”

Relations between the two countries soured after the Maldives prematurely terminated the contract with India’s GMR Group for the management of Ibrahim Nasir International Airport.

India retaliated by tightening visa restrictions on the Maldives’ medical tourists (TTG Asia e-Daily , January 09th, 2013 ).

Mohamed Nasser, Maldivian ambassador to India, remarked: “There are more than 20,000 Maldivians living in south India. Even last year, though we had visa issues, it didn’t deter Maldivians from travelling to India. However, with the help of this new visa regime, the number of Maldivians arriving in India will certainly increae as most of the Maldivians travelling to India are medical tourists.”

India registered 40,000 Maldivian arrivals in 2013.

source: http://www.ttgasia.com / TTG Asia / Home> Daily News Archives / by Rohit Kaul / New Delhi – February 05th, 2014

Czech Republic a mecca for medical tourism

CzechCT07feb2014

Právo: Foreigners spend millions on health care in Czech Republic

Prague :

More and more foreigners seek paid health care services, primarily plastic surgery, surgical treatment of obesity and assisted reproduction, in the Czech Republic, annually spending tens of millions of crowns on them, the daily Právo writes today.

Britons, Germans, Austrians and Russians prevail among foreign clients of Czech health care centers.

The reasons are obvious: they would pay up to 50 percent less for the treatment while the quality and conditions in the Czech Republic are comparable to those in their countries, Právo says.

Another significant reason is that patients often want to conceal plastic surgery from their acquaintances. This is why they like to undergo it abroad, taking holiday over it, Právo says.

“In 2012, the Czech Republic became the most favourite medical tourism destination for Britons,” Ondřej Šebestík, from HealthCzech company, told Právo.

According to preliminary estimates, the number of foreign tourists seeking treatment in the Czech Republic increased in 2013 as well. Both foreign opinion polls and figures from Czech clinics confirm this trend, Právo adds.

It writes that the number of foreign clients of Czech clinics more than doubled in the past years, which is reflected in the facilities’ proceeds.

Besides, the number of English-speaking patients interested in the treatment in the Czech Republic increased more than four times between 2011 and 2012, Šebestík added.

The economic crisis slightly impeded the boom of medical tourism but after the decline in 2008, the number of Britons, for instance, seeking health care abroad started to rise again, Právo says.

Foreigners appreciate the high level of health services in the Czech Republic, similar to Western standards, but for twice or three times lower prices.

The most popular plastic surgery is breast augmentation with implants, which costs an equivalent of over 110,000 Kč in Britain and about 90,000 Kč in Germany, while in Czech clinics it is some 60,000 Kč only, Právo notes.

“In 2013, we provided care for over 1,000 clients from Germany, who arrived in the Czech Republic mainly to seek plastic surgery and assisted reproduction,” ISCARE clinical center general director František Lambert said.

Foreigners seek most frequently breast operations in the Czech Republic, which make up almost 50 percent, followed by liposuction, abdominal plastic surgery, face lifting and eyelid surgery, he added.

A client spends 65,000 Kč in the center on average, Právo says.

Besides, it writes, foreign couples who need assisted reproduction technology go to the Czech Republic also because of its more flexible legislation, compared to other countries. Czech law enables anonymous sperm and egg donation, for instance.

In Europe, the Czech Republic, along with Spain, is the most popular destination for infertile couples,” ISCARE assisted reproduction centre head doctor Jaroslav Hulvert confirmed to ČTK.

“We estimate that 4000-5000 IVF (in vitro fertilisation) cycles were carried out to foreign clients in the Czech Republic in 2013,” Eizellspende IVF company executive Oliver Nosek told Právo.

Another boom of medical tourism can be expected in connection with the EU directive under which any EU citizen who has the right to a treatment covered by health care insurance in his home country can apply it in any other EU member state on condition it is not available at home in a reasonable time horizon and if the treatment costs do not exceed the costs at home, Právo writes.

The EU members had to transpose this regulation into their legal orders as of October 2013, it adds.

source: http://www.praguepost.com / Prague Post / Home> EU News / by Czech News Agency / Prague – February 03rd, 2014

‘Maternity tourists’ flocking to Britain for free care on NHS

PREGNANT foreigners are flying to Britain in droves to take advantage of free NHS care.

The women are using forged doctors notes to board the aircraft [GETTY]

The women are using forged doctors notes to board the aircraft [GETTY]

More than 300 women who were about to give birth were stopped at Gatwick in a two year period, according to a government report.

Most of the women received treatment on the NHS after being deemed to close to giving birth to return home.

The total exploiting the health service is thought to much higher, as Gatwick has a limited number of flights from countries with the highest rate of so-called health tourists.

Despite airlines usually not allowing mothers-to-be who are more than 36 weeks pregnant to fly, the women were able to gain entrance to the UK by using forged doctors notes which hid how far along they were.

The already stretched health service is set to come under even more pressure next week when labour market restrictions are lifted and thousands of Romanian and Bulgarian immigrants are predicted to flood the UK.

The revelation comes from a previously unpublished report seen by the Sunday Telegraph which was prepared in 2010, outlining plans to refuse those with unpaid NHS entry to Britain.

Another report included quotes from an immigration officer, who was furious at the extent of the problem.

He said: “Sometimes they will come back for their second or third baby.

“Sometimes they will quite blatantly say, ‘I’m coming because the care is better’, and once they are here, if they are assessed to a certain gestation, then we are stuck.”

Health tourism costs the NHS up to £80 million a year – enough to pay for around 2,000 nurses – the Government has said.

source: http://www.express.co.uk / Expressy  / Home> News> UK / by Benjamin Russell / Sunday – December 29th, 2013

Experts: Regulation needed for medical tourism

Sub-industry helps pay bills for Israeli healthcare but still requires oversight, Knesset committee is told.

MK Haim Katz (Likud) Photo: Marc Israel Sellem

MK Haim Katz (Likud) Photo: Marc Israel Sellem

Medical tourism will be regulated through legislation, Likud MK Haim Katz, chairman of the Knesset Labor, Social Welfare and Health Committee, said on Monday during discussion of a Channel 2 investigation into the treatment of foreigners by three surgeons at Tel Aviv’s Sourasky Medical Center.

Health Minister Yael German added that medical tourism was beneficial because “it gives doctors experience” and can be shifted from the center of the country, where is it largely practiced, to the periphery.

Katz claimed that “unfortunately, both the Finance Ministry and the hospitals don’t listen to the Health Ministry’s instructions on the matter; thus regulation has to be legislated.

I have the impression that treating foreign patients well spreads the good name of Israel and serves as an ambassador of good will.”

However, health experts maintain that the ministry has not issued clear guidelines on what is and isn’t permitted for physicians who treat foreign patients, leading to findings by the investigative program Uvda on doctors who allegedly take payments for neurosurgery and cardiac surgery performed on foreigners at the medical center.

Over the years, while ministry professionals have long been in favor of regulation, politicians from the Prime Minister’s Office on down have pushed for encouraging almost unlimited medical tourism, they say.

German cited a “shortage of money” in the health system.

“In the coming years, we won’t get [from the Treasury] the NIS 8 billion we need for public health, so we need to consider additional sources of funds while carefully preserving equity and justice,” she said.

“The topic worked under the radar screen because there was no regulation,” she continued.

“It is clear that medical tourism cannot be abolished. Think of the possibility of an online system in which we could know where there are empty beds at any given moment in the hospitals, where we would refer foreign patients…. With proper regulation, we will be able to serve the Israeli pubic and enrich the public purse.”

Health Ministry director-general Ronni Gamzu – who previously was director-general of the Sourasky Medical Center’s Ichilov Hospital – said he bore some responsibility for the growth in medical tourism, although he admitted that this growth had become “problematic.”

“The pay for a surgeon who treats a tourist is three or four times what he gets for operating on an Israeli patient,” Gamzu said. “Already today, I will rush instructions to hospitals that they must not pay those who operate on foreign tourists any more than they get for operating on local residents.”

To this, Israel Medical Association director-general Leon Eidelman said: “You have killed it [medical tourism in the public hospitals]. They will all go for surgery to Assuta [Medical Centers, the chain of private hospitals].”

Sheba Medical Center director- general Zev Rotstein said that medical tourism “raises the level of Israel medicine,” thus benefiting all Israelis.

“The treatment is provided after the doctors’ regular working hours and not at the expense of Israelis,” Rotstein explained. “The share of foreigners compared to Israelis in my hospital is only 15 percent, and the income is only 6.36% of Sheba’s total income. But this money is important because I can’t get it from the government. Regulation is not the solution for everything.

Sometimes it interferes. Let the hospital managers run things.”

Labor MK Mickey Rosenthal said that funds from medical tourism must go the periphery, “where residents live a decade less on average than those in the center of the country.”

Meretz MK Ilan Gillon argued that he wanted the health ministry to finance “my healthcare, and not that of a tourist from Uzbekistan.”

Meanwhile, Katz – in a separate committee discussion on health fund deficits – said a proposed NIS 75 million for insurers was much too small.

“This is a pitiful sum that covers almost nothing, and it is due to be given only from next year,” he said. “The Treasury is smashing the health system. It can’t be that all the experts… say there is a huge deficit, and only the boys at the Treasury, who only yesterday graduated from university, say something else.”

Bank of Israel economist Eran Pulitzer said the gap in health funding was “liable to cause harm in the level of services.”

Zev Wurmbrand, director of Clalit Health Services, said that some NIS 700m. was needed by the health funds to cover deficits just from 2013.

“At the same time, there must be supervision to ensure that the money will go to improve services, and not to salaries,” he said.

source: http://www.jpost.com / Jerusalem Post / Home> Health & Science / by Judy Siegel-Itzkovich / December 23rd, 2013

Medical tourism proves lucrative source of income for UK’s Health Service

Medical tourism is a lucrative source of income for the UK’s National Health Service (NHS), according to a major new study that contradicts many of the assumptions behind the government’s announcement that it will clamp down on foreigners abusing the health service.

The research flies in the face of assertions by Jeremy Hunt, the health secretary, that medical tourists cost the health service money.

Image via starmedical.co.uk

Image via starmedical.co.uk

Eighteen hospitals – those deemed most likely to be making money from overseas patients – earned £42 m in 2010, according to researchers from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and York University. Medical tourists spent an estimated £219 m on hotels, restaurants, shopping and transport in the UK.

The researchers also found that more people leave the UK seeking medical treatment abroad than arrive in this country for care: about 63,000 people from the country travelled to hospitals and clinics abroad in 2010, while considerably fewer, about 52,000 people, came here.

The research flies in the face of assertions by Jeremy Hunt, the health secretary, that the tourists cost the health service money.

He said on Tuesday: “It’s time for action to ensure the NHS is a national health service – not an international one. With the NHS already under pressure from an ageing population, it cannot be right that large amounts of taxpayers’ money is being lost through treating people who should be paying from foreign countries.”

But the lead author of the new study, Johanna Hanefeld, from the faculty of public health and policy at the LSHTM, said the government-commissioned research published on Tuesday was “much more across the government immigration agenda than anything to do with health.”

Their work, published in the open access journal Public Library of Science (PLoS) One, looks at incoming and outgoing medical tourists. Those flying in to the UK include expat Britons living in countries such as Spain which have tightened up their own rules on access to healthcare, they say.

Some NHS hospitals earn substantial sums of money from medical tourists and others could join them in doing so, say Hanefeld and colleagues.

They used freedom of information requests to obtain figures from 18 hospitals. Great Ormond Street children’s hospital earned £20.7 m from foreign patients in 2010-11; Kings earned £7.9 m and the Royal Brompton earned £7.4 m.

People from the UK traveled abroad for procedures they could not get on the NHS or where the waiting lists were too long. The study looked at those travelling for fertility treatment, bariatric surgery (to reduce the stomach size in obese patients) and cosmetic surgery.

On Tuesday, Hunt published estimates of the amount of money that non-paying health tourism costs the NHS. This included notional sums for visitors working or studying in the UK, totaling £1.4 bn. He announced that in future there would be a charge of £150 for foreign students and £200 for temporary migrants, which would generate £200 m a year.

The government documents also attempted to put a figure on the cost of healthcare for what they admitted were the “very uncertain” numbers of “irregular migrants,” whom they estimated cost the NHS £0.3 bn. The third category was “health tourists” who had travelled with the intention of getting free treatment, said to cost the NHS between £70 m and £300 m.

But this approach takes no account of the increasing global mobility of patients, some of whom are lucrative paying customers and others who are saving the NHS money by going abroad, says Hanefeld.

“If we really want to address the issues around health tourism or patient mobility, we can’t do it as one country,” she said. “We would need international mechanisms.”

The NHS is not set up even to count the numbers of paying and non-paying health tourists, she said. “It would require a sea change in the NHS to begin challenging or following them up,” she said. Nobody had calculated how much it would cost the NHS to set up such a system.

Source: The Guardian
source: http://www.eturbonews.com / eTN Global Travel Industry News / December 20th, 2013